| Seminars, interviews & commentary December 18, 2008 | |
| Bah, humbug! The media law year in review | |
|
With 2008 limping to a close, the Gazette asked a loose collection of media law luminaries (and others) what they thought were the most significant/interesting developments of the past year. Not unsurprisingly, privacy was a major concern … more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary December 3, 2008 | |
| Qualified privilege: a question of judicial attitude | |
|
Media law academic Dr David Rolph compares the UK’s “responsible journalism” qualified privilege defence with Australia’s “reasonableness” qualified privilege defence. He concludes that the consistent failure of the defence in Australia rests squarely with judicial attitudes to the media ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary December 1, 2008 | |
| Making "libel tourists" pay | |
|
The US Congress is considering its own, stronger version of the “libel terrorism” bill introduced in New York State earlier this year. Michael Cameron reports on what it will mean for writers, publishers and foreign plaintiffs ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary November 3, 2008 | |
| "Post"modernism: Reputation as celebrity | |
|
Former NSW defamation judge David Levine reviews Sydney academic Dr David Rolph’s thoroughly modern take on the subject Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law and finds it “original, stimulating and thought provoking” ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary October 17, 2008 | |
| Mark Polden | |
|
Mark Polden made an official exit from Fairfax Media’s in-house legal team last week. This week, in an exclusive video interview with the Gazette, he reflects on the 20 years he worked on the Fairfax business, talks about what’s wrong with the new Defamation Act and explains why he won’t be giving Mark O’Brien and co. any advice ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary September 5, 2008 | |
| Privacy - where reasonable minds differ | |
|
Was the ABC right not to appeal Judge Felicity Hampel’s decision in Doe v ABC? And was Jane Doe’s identity in the public domain simply because she disclosed it to some people? Dr David Rolph takes issue with Stephen Collins, in the light of statutory provisions and the common law ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary August 20, 2008 | |
| Of Mice and Mosley | |
|
The former head of ABC Legal, Stephen Collins, takes an uncompromising look at the state of privacy here, and in the UK. He argues the ABC got it wrong by not appealing Justice Felicity Hampel’s decision in Jane Doe v ABC and that Britain’s Justice Eady got it right in Mosley v News Group Newspapers. So where’s the rub? ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary August 18, 2008 | |
| Whistleblower protection and the media | |
|
How far should whistleblower protection extend and whom should it embrace? The Australian Press Council’s Policy Officer Inez Ryan looks at the legislative landscape and argues that whistleblower protection which doesn’t include the media is no protection at all ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary July 22, 2008 | |
| The right to be unreasonable | |
|
Michael Cameron examines a recent and unanimous Supreme Court of Canada judgment that extended the defence of fair comment. The court affirmed radio jock Rafe Mair’s “right to be unreasonable” without the need to prove his “honest belief” ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary July 21, 2008 | |
| In defence of qualified privilege | |
|
Stephen Collins, former head of ABC legal, now at Channel 4 in London, looks at a recent UK summary judgment upholding common law qualified privilege and asks why this defence fails so frequently and abysmally in Australia ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary June 25, 2008 | |
| Trial by jury under the new Defamation Act (2005) | |
|
NSW defamation barristers Terry Tobin QC and Stuart Littlemore QC grapple with the cap on damages, judicial discretion, general verdicts, who owns contextual truth and the proper attribution of malice under the new uniform Defamation Act (2005) ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary March 20, 2008 | |
| Libel tourists out, says New York State | |
|
As “libel tourism” burgeons in Britain, the State of New York is set to protect its writers and journalists from such action via the Libel Terrorism Protection Act. Michael Cameron reports from the Big Apple on what this means for free speech and America’s “war on terror” ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary March 17, 2008 | |
| Privy Council's Reynolds privilege not what it seems | |
|
Stephen Collins, former head of ABC legal, now at Channel 4 in London, reviews the recent Privy Council decision in Seaga v Harper and comes to a startling conclusion: this expansion of Reynolds qualified privilege amounts to a restriction of free speech ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary March 12, 2008 | |
| How deep is the "media safe harbour"? | |
|
Peter Applegarth SC examines the state of the so-called “media safe harbour” in light of several recent decisions; one from the NSW Court of Appeal and two from the Federal Court. The protection afforded by section 65A of the Trade Practices Act may turn out to be deeply shallow ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary March 6, 2008 | |
| A brief history of business defamation | |
|
Michaela Whitbourn takes a long, hard look at the development of “business defamation” and concludes that while it may be a boon for business, it has no basis in the common law ... more |
| Seminars, interviews & commentary March 4, 2008 | |
| Reputation and Defamation - Lawrence McNamara | |
|
Patrick George (pic) Kennedys partner and the author of Defamation Law in Australia, interrogates the latest tome on the subject, Reputation and Defamation by former Sydney academic Lawrence McNamara … more |

Print this Issue
